About a legalization of gay adoption - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1469 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/07/30 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Gay Adoption Essay Did you like this example? Adoption has been around for many years, but only recently has the question of gay adoption risen. There are many orphans in the world, but not enough families or parents to take them in. There arent that many families who can and will adopt children, whether its because they cant support them, they have children of their own, or they just dont want children. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "About a legalization of gay adoption" essay for you Create order The end result is still an overabundance of orphaned children in need of a loving family. There is a solution to this problem. Gay adoption. There is a rising amount of open homosexual couples everywhere and most of them would love to have kids, but its still illegal for homosexual couples to adopt children in some areas of the U.S., let alone the world. All across our country, and in other countries, there are children awaiting adoption and eager parents who would like to welcome those children into their homes, but are banned from doing so. These parents have done nothing wrong and possess the same skills and resources as other potential parents, and yet they are not allowed to give a child everything he or she needs, love, protection, and security. So why are these potential parents banned from adopting? Discrimination and prejudices are the main cause of this unconstitutional act. Adoption to gay couples should be legalized everywhere because anyone who is able to meet the requir ements of being a loving parent deserves to become a parent, despite their sexual preferences and many kids would be grateful to have two loving parents. There are a many different reasons why gay adoption is banned and many people who object to it. While some states are becoming more open minded, other states remain close minded and remain strict in its stand against gay adoption, so in those states, its still illegal for gay couples to adopt children. Some would say that it could cause psychological problems, that it isnt natural, or that the couples wouldnt be good parents. Others would be against it for religious reasons. Some people like Bill Maier, a child psychologist working with the conservative Focus on the Family, would say, Children in foster care ?are already scarred by abuse and neglect, we would want to do everything we could to place them in the optimal home environment. But studies show that gay couples are doing really well raising children. With gay couples adopting, there could be many more homes available for kids and orphans around the world. Im sure that a foster child would prefer to love in a loving and nurtur ing home with a gay couple, rather than move around from foster parent to foster parent. Foster children are often victims of foster care shuffle. For example, a child can live in twenty different homes before he or she turns eighteen. Anna Freud, a child psychologist, wrote a child can handle almost anything better than instability. In the United States alone, the number of children forced into the foster care system is incredible. According to the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System Report there were about 423,773 children in foster care in the United States only a couple of years ago. ( afcars report). Each foster child in the system should have a chance at adoption so to deny gay couples the right to adopt is not only heartbreaking for both the child and the potential gay couple but also unconstitutional. In some areas, gay parents are already serving as foster parents towards children so gay adoption is just a step away. One religion against gay adoption is the Catholic religion; it opposes gay adoption because its belief is that its not healthy for a child to grow up with gay parents. They argue that because gays or lesbian couples consist of only one sex, the child is denied either a father or a mother. However, they are forgetting that gays are normal people who have families which can include parents, aunts, uncles, cousins, grandparents, friends and many others that the children can be influenced by, and while the parents will be the childs main influence, they will have other people in their lives too. A requirement of being a parent shouldnt focus on a persons sexual orientation; its not an aspect that should matter. The main things to look for when evaluating a persons worth as a parent should be whether or not the person is caring, devoted, and stable. In an article by Jon Campbell, it is stated that a man, Danny Stewart, found a recently-born baby on a subway. The baby was taken into custody and when Jon Campbell was asked to testify about this baby the judge asked if he was interested in adopting. Soon after, he and his partner, Peter Mercurio, adopted the baby, thinking that it might be their only chance in adopting a child. Another example of how much gay couples value having children is shown by Birtcher, a 44 year old hair salon owner, when he said, Our prisons are full of people who were in foster care, and those people were in, quote unquote, straight family homes, if I can provide a loving, stable home for my little boy, thats the goal. These articles show how much gay couples value having children and it shows that they could great parents, despite irrational arguments against them. Another argument that some would make is that growing up in a family with gay parents could have damaging and lasting psychological effects on the child. And while some may agree to this, Bryan Samuels, from Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, proves to those who agree with that statement wrong. He clearly stated, The child welfare system has come to understand that placing a child in a gay or lesbian family is no greater risk than placing them in a heterosexual family. Another source states that High-risk children adopted from foster care do equally well when placed with gay, lesbian or heterosexual parents, UCLA psychologists report in the first multi-year study of children adopted by these three groups of parents.(Wolpert). The only possible damaging psychological effects are from the bullying from ignorant peers that learned prejudices passed down from their parents. The society worries about gays as parents, but gay parents worry about the impact of society on their children. The prejudices from society can harm these adopted children only because its still a rarity. However, if gays and lesbians were able to adopt more frequently, and without discrimination, society would be more open about gays as parents. A nine-year-old little girl kept getting teased because of her parents sexual orientations. Does that sound wrong? It should. If society was more accepting, her peers would be less likely to tease her. Allowing homosexual couples to adopt everywhere will open so many more doors, children in foster care will have a higher chance at a permanent home, and gays will have the rights to be parents given back to them, something that should have never been taken away in the first place. Ultimately, the legalization of gay adoption everywhere would benefit our society, having loving homes in which orphaned children can go to is a blessing for both the child and the parents. It would lessen the probability of juvenile delinquents resulting from the horrible conditions of the foster care system. Children wouldnt be harmfully affected growing up with homosexual parents; they would be more than likely to be grateful to have a family. Anyone who has the ability to raise a child in a loving and secure home and most importantly, wants a child, deserves to become a parent and should not be denied the pleasure of raising a child. Gay adoption is a positive solution to the number of children that go each year without a loving home and family. Works Cited Sunshine, Adams. Gay Adoption Research Paper | The Official Adam Lambert Site. The Official Adam Lambert Site. Adam Lambert Site, 3 May 2011. Web. 27 Nov. 2013. Gay Adoption. Love and Pride, 2012. Web. 24 Mar. 2013. Hitt, Caitlyn. Theres No Difference Between Same-Sex Opposite Sex Parents.YourTango. Your Tango, 18 Mar. 2013. Web. 24 Mar. 2013. Merkle, Daniel. More Americans Support Gay Adoption. ABC News. ABC News Network, 2 Apr. 0000. Web. 24 Mar. 2013. Sieczkowski, Cavan. Gay Couple Shares Unbelievable Story Of Adoption After Finding Baby On Subway. The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post, 01 Mar. 2013. Web. 24 Mar. 2013. Stone, Andrea. USATODAY.com Both Sides on Gay Adoption Cite Concern for Children. USATODAY.com Both Sides on Gay Adoption Cite Concern for Children. USA Today, 20 Feb. 2006. Web. 28 Mar. 2013. Tavernise, Sabrina. Adoptions Rise by Same-Sex Couples, Despite Legal Barriers. The New York Times. The New York Times, 13 June 2011. Web. 24 Mar. 2013. Wolpert, Stuart. For News Media. Foster Kids Do Equally Well When Adopted by Gay, Lesbian Or Heterosexual Parents / UCLA Newsroom. Ucla Newsroom, 18 Oct. 2012. Web. 24 Mar. 2013.

Drury University Admission ACT Scores, Acceptance Rate

Software Developer Free Essays

R N S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CHANNASANDRA, BANGALORE – 61 UNIX SYSTEM PROGRAMMING NOTES FOR 6TH SEMESTER INFORMATION SCIENCE SUBJECT CODE: 06CS62 PREPARED BY RAJKUMAR Assistant Professor Department of Information Science DIVYA K 1RN09IS016 6th Semester Information Science and Engineering 1rn09is016@gmail. com Text Books: 1 Terrence Chan: Unix System Programming Using C++, Prentice Hall India, 1999. 2 W. We will write a custom essay sample on Software Developer or any similar topic only for you Order Now Richard Stevens, Stephen A. Rago: Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment, 2nd Edition, Pearson Education / PHI, 2005 Notes have been circulated on self risk nobody can be held responsible if anything is wrong or is improper information or insufficient information provided in it. Contents: UNIT 1, UNIT 2, UNIT 3, UNIT 4, UNIT 5, UNIT 6, UNIT 7 RNSIT UNIX SYSTEM PROGRAMMING NOTES UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION UNIX AND ANSI STANDARDS UNIX is a computer operating system originally developed in 1969 by a group of ATT employees at Bell Labs, including Ken Thompson, Dennis Ritchie, Douglas McElroy and Joe Ossanna. Today UNIX systems are split into various branches, developed over time by ATT as well as various commercial vendors and non-profit organizations. The ANSI C Standard In 1989, American National Standard Institute (ANSI) proposed C programming language standard X3. 159-1989 to standardise the language constructs and libraries. This is termed as ANSI C standard. This attempt to unify the implementation of the C language supported on all computer system. The major differences between ANSI C and KR C [Kernighan and Ritchie] are as follows: ? Function prototyping ? Support of the const and volatile data type qualifiers. Support wide characters and internationalization. ? Permit function pointers to be used without dereferencing. Function prototyping ANSI C adopts C++ function prototype technique where function definition and declaration include function names, arguments’ data types, and return value data types. This enables ANSI C compilers to check for function calls in user progr ams that pass invalid number of arguments or incompatible arguments’ data type. These fix a major weakness of KR C compilers: invalid function calls in user programs often pass compilation but cause programs to crash when they are executed. Eg: unsigned long foo(char * fmt, double data) { /*body of foo*/ } unsigned long foo(char * fmt, double data); eg: int printf(const char* fmt,†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. ); External declaration of this function foo is specify variable number of arguments Support of the const and volatile data type qualifiers. ? The const keyword declares that some data cannot be changed. Eg: int printf(const char* fmt,†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.. ); Declares a fmt argument that is of a const char * data type, meaning that the function printf cannot modify data in any character array that is passed as an actual argument value to fmt. Volatile keyword specifies that the values of some variables may change asynchronously, giving an hint to the compiler’s optimization algorithm not to remove any â€Å"redundant† statements that involve â€Å"volatile† objects. char get_io() { volatile char* io_port = 0x7777; char ch = *io_port; /*read first byte of data*/ ch = *io_port; /*read second byte of data*/ } ? eg: If io_port variable is not declared to be volatile when the program is compiled, the compiler may eliminate second ch = *io_port statement, as it is considered redundant with respect to the previous statement. Prepared By: RAJKUMAR [Asst. Prof. ] DIVYA K [1RN09IS016] Page 1 RNSIT UNIX SYSTEM PROGRAMMING NOTES The const and volatile data type qualifiers are also supported in C++. Support wide characters and internationalisation ? ? ANSI C supports internationalisation by allowing C-program to use wide characters. Wide characters use more than one byte of storage per character. ANSI C defines t he setlocale function, which allows users to specify the format of date, monetary and real number representations. For eg: most countries display the date in dd/mm/yyyy format whereas US displays it in mm/dd/yyyy format. Function prototype of setlocale function is: ? #include char setlocale (int category, const char* locale); ? The setlocale function prototype and possible values of the category argument are declared in the header. The category values specify what format class(es) is to be changed. Some of the possible values of the category argument are: category value effect on standard C functions/macros LC_CTYPE LC_TIME LC_NUMERIC LC_MONETARY LC_ALL ? ? ? ? ? Affects behavior of the macros Affects date and time format. Affects number representation format Affects monetary values format combines the affect of all above Permit function pointers without dereferencing ANSI C specifies that a function pointer may be used like a function name. No referencing is needed when calling a function whose address is contained in the pointer. For Example, the following statement given below defines a function pointer funptr, which contains the address of the function foo. extern void foo(double xyz,const int *ptr); void (*funptr)(double,const int *)=foo; The function foo may be invoked by either directly calling foo or via the funptr. foo(12. 78,†Hello world†); funptr(12. 78,†Hello world†); KR C requires funptr be dereferenced to call foo. (* funptr) (13. 48,†Hello usp†); ANSI C also defines a set of C processor(cpp) symbols, which may be used in user programs. These symbols are assigned actual values at compilation time. cpp SYMBOL USE _STDC_ Feature test macro. Value is 1 if a compiler is ANSI C, 0 otherwise _LINE_ Evaluated to the physical line number of a source file. _FILE_ Value is the file name of a module that contains this symbol. _DATE_ Value is the date that a module containing this symbol is compiled. _TIME_ value is the time that a module containing this symbol is compiled. The following test_ansi_c. c program illustrates the use of these symbols: #include int main() { #if _STDC_==0 printf(â€Å"cc is not ANSI C compliant†); #else printf(â€Å"%s compiled at %s:%s. This statement is at line %d †, _FILE_ , _DATE_ , _TIME_ , _LINE_ );